In a recent pre-trial hearing in Xenia, Ohio, a judge agreed with a prosecutor’s motion to prohibit the defendant from mentioning the Constitution or the constitutionality of the law he was charged with violating.
Judge Catherine Barber stated “there will be no mentioning of the Constitution” to the defendant, Virgil Vaduva.
The prosecutor made the claim that mentioning the Constitution “will confuse the jury,” to which Vaduva replied that uttering words on a public sidewalk, his panhandling charge, constitutes free speech.
MOVE TO PAGE 2:
Insanity
Then she is no judge
Shouldn’t. Be a judge
Throw her out. Why is she a judge any way?
If this is true, SHE should br banned from the bench.
Oh wow! Another communist on the bench. Dang!
why will you fire him ? you should have hear from him ! so if I ask you for love for you to marry me you will ask them to cut off my$#%&!@*???? so sad ma
Remind me to never move to OHIO.
Then she’s no judge at all.
I think she should lose her license or whatever to practice law and be a judge. And should be tried for treason . That’s a violation of her oath she took.