In a recent pre-trial hearing in Xenia, Ohio, a judge agreed with a prosecutor’s motion to prohibit the defendant from mentioning the Constitution or the constitutionality of the law he was charged with violating.
Judge Catherine Barber stated “there will be no mentioning of the Constitution” to the defendant, Virgil Vaduva.
The prosecutor made the claim that mentioning the Constitution “will confuse the jury,” to which Vaduva replied that uttering words on a public sidewalk, his panhandling charge, constitutes free speech.
MOVE TO PAGE 2:
:facepalm:
I thought her oath was to defend the constitution
Terrorist
She Doesnt Have Any Authority To Ban Mentioning The Constitution in her court room.
I have a hard time believing this if it is true she should be she should be removed.
To uphold the Constitution is part of her oath
If this is true then no one has to abide by her courts findings.
WHAT??????? Our laws are written around the constitution!
CHURCHILL: “Christianity (and also Judaism) is conducive to the civilization of mankind, meaning the public recognition of the equal natural rights of all human beings. It moderates man’s passions and increases the propensity for toleration. ISLAM does NOT.” <> BRILLIANT Churchill ~ People who want MUSLIM refugees are shortsighted and dangerous http://www.thefederalistpapers.org/us/winston-churchills-brutal-takedown-of-islam-means-more-today-than-ever
“F” her! This is America!