In a recent pre-trial hearing in Xenia, Ohio, a judge agreed with a prosecutor’s motion to prohibit the defendant from mentioning the Constitution or the constitutionality of the law he was charged with violating.
Judge Catherine Barber stated “there will be no mentioning of the Constitution” to the defendant, Virgil Vaduva.
The prosecutor made the claim that mentioning the Constitution “will confuse the jury,” to which Vaduva replied that uttering words on a public sidewalk, his panhandling charge, constitutes free speech.
MOVE TO PAGE 2:
Not her court the peoples court she needs to be removed from.the bench
She needs to be removed, she swore to uphold the Constitution.
Throw her OUT
She should immediately be removed from bench!
She must be muslim
Fire her
UNCONSTITUTIONAL, GOING AGAINST OUR CONSTITUTION IS A FEDERAL CRIME. ALL LAWS OF AMERICA ARE CONSTITUTIONAL. Just another way Obama is trying to put sharia law over our Constitution
Remove her.
Not true
Remember her when election time comes around