In a recent pre-trial hearing in Xenia, Ohio, a judge agreed with a prosecutor’s motion to prohibit the defendant from mentioning the Constitution or the constitutionality of the law he was charged with violating.
Judge Catherine Barber stated “there will be no mentioning of the Constitution” to the defendant, Virgil Vaduva.
The prosecutor made the claim that mentioning the Constitution “will confuse the jury,” to which Vaduva replied that uttering words on a public sidewalk, his panhandling charge, constitutes free speech.
MOVE TO PAGE 2:
Too stupid for words
The Constitution continues to guide the law of the land whether it can be mentioned or not. Freedom of speech is still in effect.
aNOTHER LIBERAL TRAITOR
Huh!?
This judge needs to be disbarred.
The charge in question may only be ‘panhandling’ but, it this is true, it’s the Camel’s nose under the tent on the slippery slope to getting the Constitution ruled Unconstitutional…
should be fired
she should be banned from being in that court…fire her!!!!!!!
Then why is she still on the bench? Why hasn’t the city removed her? Obamas really made this country better hasn’t he?
WRONG !