In a recent pre-trial hearing in Xenia, Ohio, a judge agreed with a prosecutor’s motion to prohibit the defendant from mentioning the Constitution or the constitutionality of the law he was charged with violating.
Judge Catherine Barber stated “there will be no mentioning of the Constitution” to the defendant, Virgil Vaduva.
The prosecutor made the claim that mentioning the Constitution “will confuse the jury,” to which Vaduva replied that uttering words on a public sidewalk, his panhandling charge, constitutes free speech.
MOVE TO PAGE 2:
What happens when Democrat Communist get power.
This has gone too far. The Constitution is the very basis of American law. She should be removed immediately.
Happy christmas to u all ….single men should add me up for a chat.
She needs to go.
She should be recalled.
THEN SHE SHOULD NOT BE A JUDGE……. AND HAS NO BUSINESS PRACTICING LAW OF ANY KIND HERE IN THE US
The judge needs to be remove from court and cained in the public square.
OOOOOO HEL NO
Judge–what is our first amendment–you are NOT a judge
OH MY GOD, ARE YOU KIDDING ME!