In a recent pre-trial hearing in Xenia, Ohio, a judge agreed with a prosecutor’s motion to prohibit the defendant from mentioning the Constitution or the constitutionality of the law he was charged with violating.
Judge Catherine Barber stated “there will be no mentioning of the Constitution” to the defendant, Virgil Vaduva.
The prosecutor made the claim that mentioning the Constitution “will confuse the jury,” to which Vaduva replied that uttering words on a public sidewalk, his panhandling charge, constitutes free speech.
MOVE TO PAGE 2:
Then fire her. It’s her duty to uphold the constitution.
get out
Immediately remove this person who has taken an oath to serve and protect the law. That would include the U.S. Constitution.
Panhandling charge?? Did I read that right?
That’s Communism.
Sorry judge, 1st amendment supersedes your ban.? Tell us again how you became a judge or for that matter passed the bar.
T R E A S O N
Time to get a new judge. The law is basically based on the Consttution.
Obama’s America.
Traitor to America