In a recent pre-trial hearing in Xenia, Ohio, a judge agreed with a prosecutor’s motion to prohibit the defendant from mentioning the Constitution or the constitutionality of the law he was charged with violating.
Judge Catherine Barber stated “there will be no mentioning of the Constitution” to the defendant, Virgil Vaduva.
The prosecutor made the claim that mentioning the Constitution “will confuse the jury,” to which Vaduva replied that uttering words on a public sidewalk, his panhandling charge, constitutes free speech.
MOVE TO PAGE 2:
She needs to be an ex-judge immediately.
Part time Job Opportunity For Girls,Boys,housewife, Bissinessmen and all to wants extra mony in big Brand Company… #WORK :- At Home in online system on your Mobile. #Age-:18 to 65 #EDUCATION :- 8th,10th, 12th, B.tech, Diploma, Graduate, Post Graduate, Etc.. #LOCATION :- all india #EARING INCOME:-Rs.6000 to 25000/-(min. Fresher and Experiend both can Apply on -whatsap 9670607062 Send ur name &city name (limited vacancies left)
somebody doe their research and tell me this is f**e cus im pretty sure this is f**e
Have a very hard time believing this but if this is true it is very troubling also illegal
This is wrong.
so if it is true if that is appointed by hiring process then their employment should be terminated immediately and they need to be relieved of their job duties as they are unfit to carry out the job if they are elected they need to be impeached also place in the final destination 4 official oppression so I bet you if they really did do that there’s a lot more they’re hiding
If so, relieve this judge of their duties!!!
This in itself is unconstitutional!!!!!
how can that be legal?
Then we need to riot and demand she is fired!!! This is not a great country anymore!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!/………………………………….