In a recent pre-trial hearing in Xenia, Ohio, a judge agreed with a prosecutor’s motion to prohibit the defendant from mentioning the Constitution or the constitutionality of the law he was charged with violating.
Judge Catherine Barber stated “there will be no mentioning of the Constitution” to the defendant, Virgil Vaduva.
The prosecutor made the claim that mentioning the Constitution “will confuse the jury,” to which Vaduva replied that uttering words on a public sidewalk, his panhandling charge, constitutes free speech.
MOVE TO PAGE 2:
Yeah that’s one of Obama’s people ,
It would be a cold day!!!!!!!!!!!
Take her out of the court
Is this even allowed, if its isn’t disbar her and never let her practice any type of law again!
We must start getting involved to cut these types of people, because if we allow it just once then it will happen again and again just like what we have with Obama!
Disbar her
So if she is not following the US Constitution what law is she using?
????????
The whole reason of having a court is the Constitution. What about innocent until proven guilty? What about pleading the 5th amendment? What about a jury of your peers? What the he__ is going on here?
That’s unconstitutional