In a recent pre-trial hearing in Xenia, Ohio, a judge agreed with a prosecutor’s motion to prohibit the defendant from mentioning the Constitution or the constitutionality of the law he was charged with violating.
Judge Catherine Barber stated “there will be no mentioning of the Constitution” to the defendant, Virgil Vaduva.
The prosecutor made the claim that mentioning the Constitution “will confuse the jury,” to which Vaduva replied that uttering words on a public sidewalk, his panhandling charge, constitutes free speech.
MOVE TO PAGE 2:
Um, besides being unconstitutional on it’s face it also deprives people before the Court of due process, does it not?
Replace her with me. At least I believe in the Constitution.
Another Muslim.
What is happening to our country.
Remove her
So…she isn’t an American judge?
Get rid of her now. What you allow will continue. FIGHT.
It is very hard to believe since all of are laws are based on the Constitution!
The constitution is the reason she is allowed to be a judge in a court.
I am starting not to believe anything I read online.