In a recent pre-trial hearing in Xenia, Ohio, a judge agreed with a prosecutor’s motion to prohibit the defendant from mentioning the Constitution or the constitutionality of the law he was charged with violating.
Judge Catherine Barber stated “there will be no mentioning of the Constitution” to the defendant, Virgil Vaduva.
The prosecutor made the claim that mentioning the Constitution “will confuse the jury,” to which Vaduva replied that uttering words on a public sidewalk, his panhandling charge, constitutes free speech.
MOVE TO PAGE 2:
Then answer me this, Why is president Non-Citizen Barack Hussein Obama ALIVE?
Insanity!!!
Fire that communist!
Lock up the judge if the Constitution isn’t allowed in “her” courtroom
What is wrong with this person?
If true, and that’s a big if. It sounds like grounds for an appeal, if convicted.
If they don’t recognize your rights, don’t recognize the court
violation
One city at a time, somebody has to step up,
She should be fired immediately