In a recent pre-trial hearing in Xenia, Ohio, a judge agreed with a prosecutor’s motion to prohibit the defendant from mentioning the Constitution or the constitutionality of the law he was charged with violating.
Judge Catherine Barber stated “there will be no mentioning of the Constitution” to the defendant, Virgil Vaduva.
The prosecutor made the claim that mentioning the Constitution “will confuse the jury,” to which Vaduva replied that uttering words on a public sidewalk, his panhandling charge, constitutes free speech.
MOVE TO PAGE 2:
It’s NOT her court – It’s The People’s Court!!! Boot this p.o.s. out of the courthouse!!!
Guess she didnt swear an oath to uphold the law of the land either then
She should be removed from the bench she doesn’t even belong in the US.
Get judges thrown out to the curb. This is america and its high time our judges are with our constitution.
Say what? The Constitution is what law is built on!
Can’t do that !
I live in this town and she did in fact use them very words.
Article 3 section 2 all cases that arise under the constitution
How does the people allow him to do this ?
This judge needs to be removed!