It was the moment when the entire world laughed at liberals and then lost all respect for the Nobel Prizes. When Barack Obama was announced as the winner of the Nobel Peace Prize in 2009, even the fresh-faced president pretended to be a little shocked. “To be honest, I do not feel that I deserve to be in the company of so many of the transformative figures who’ve been honored by this prize,” Obama said at the time. Still, he accepted the prize over several other much more worthy candidates. What did he do to deserve the prize?
Now, in a traditional Homer Simpson “doh!” moment, a former director of the Norwegian Nobel Institute has acknowledged that, in hindsight, he’s not so sure if giving the prize to Obama was a good move either. More regrets on the next page:
He should be man enough to return it. RIGHT!
It takes away from the meaning of the award. Our country is in more turmoil with his presidency and that doesn’t merit the award. I see nothing that would begin to be a reason for him to receive the award.
WRONG PRIZE. SHOULD HAVE BEEN THE COWARD’S PRIZE.
How much of tax payers money did that cost us
A little late
Ya think he’ll give the Million back too I douth it. Haha hahaha you all are a laughing stock a joke.
Obama the champ…
then revoke and demand its return
Just an excuse and a f**e one.
They gave it to him because he was the first black President. Period. He hadn’t been in office long enough to soil the sheets when he got it handed to him!