President Obama is about to bypass Congress once again with his royal pen and phone through an executive order that seeks to silence online speech related to firearms.
With one executive order, Obama will undermine the First and Second Amendment rights of all Americans.
Let’s take a look at what our ’emperor’ has done through the administration’s “Unified Agenda”, quietly published in the Federal Register on June 3rd…
MOVE TO PAGE 2:
He cant do that and we have the right to say anything we want to.
HA! thats a big laugh HA! HA!
He is a fool to think he can gag Americans!
So why is he getting away with this. OR is he. Where is Congress. Stop him now, if this is true. America knows what he is. So does Congress. Congress has the authority to stop him and remove him. SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Need to take away his pens
https://youtu.be/0X9NFknjTRE
https://youtu.be/-bzWSJG93P8
https://youtu.be/-bzWSJG93P8
TO HELL WITH THAT N. !!!!!!!!
“This is beyond absurd”August 22, 2015 | Cory Fritz | View Online
“The Obama administration has a lot of explaining to do,” Speaker Boehner said this week in response to an $#%&!@*ociated Press report that a secret side deal in the president’s proposed nuclear agreement with Iran will allow the Iranians to self-inspect a key military site.
National security experts and outside observers agree:
“This is a new one in the history of arms control.” “Iran will be allowed to use its own inspectors at the secret Parchin nuclear site under its secret side agreement with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)… the country that lied for years about its nuclear weapons program will now be trusted to come clean about those lies.” – Wall Street Journal Editorial, 8/20/15 “It is very unusual.” “I find it really hard to understand why you would let someone else take the samples and only see through the camera.” – Olli Heinonen, Harvard senior fellow and former IAEA deputy director general, 8/20/15 “I don’t know why they accepted it.” “It’s really not normal, and you have to worry that this would set a bad precedent in the Iran context and in the context of other countries… I think the IAEA is probably getting a little desperate to settle this.” – David Albright, founder and president of the Ins$#%&!@*ute for Science and International Security, 8/20/15 “This isn’t a game of political gotcha with Iran. It’s key to ensuring Iran can’t quickly build a nuclear weapon.” “Parchin is just one military facility that the IAEA should visit. What are the ground rules for all the others? Will Iran call the shots?” – Chicago Tribune Editorial, 7/31/15 “It’s… the devil in the details.” “Will the IAEA be present at the site?… U.S. officials consistently say that this is confidential, and it’s between the IAEA and Iran itself… These are hard questions the administration is going to have to answer.” – Jim Sciutto, CNN Chief National Security Correspondent, 8/20/15 White House is asking Congress “to take a big risk.” “They’re saying one, don’t worry because [the deal] is iron-clad and it’s good…. The other thing that’s being said is that this doesn’t really affect the fundamental validity of the deal. They’re asking [Congress] to believe those two things without really being able to know everything you would want to know.” – Charles Lane, Washington Post, 8/20/15 “This is beyond absurd.” “We know for 35 years based on evidence we cannot trust Iran… Even those who support the deal have to insist that the administration must come forward and reveal what is the content of this agreement between Iran and the IAEA. Without that full disclosure I don’t know how anybody can vote in favor of the deal.” – Gen. Jack Keane, USA (Ret.), 8/20/15 Deals “must include mechanisms that allow the U.S. to gauge compliance.” “‘Trust but verify,’ as Ronald Reagan said. Putting verification in Iran’s hands will not put anything off 10 or 15 years. It will allow Iran to keep doing whatever it wants to.” – Fort Wayne News-Sentinel Editorial, 8/21/15 “What could possibly go wrong!” “Members of Congress — and the voters who sent them there — have every right to demand transparency about agreements that truly are a critical part of the Iran nuclear deal before they vote on the deal itself.” – Boston Herald Editorial, 8/21/15 The American people want to know any nuclear agreement with Iran will keep our country safe. While President Obama refuses to provide these side deals to Congress for review and desperately dodges facts, it’s not surprising that a new CNN survey shows “a growing majority of Americans are turning against the nuclear deal with Iran and believe Congress should reject” it.