Barack Obama is once again circumventing the legislative process in order to push his administration’s unpopular leftist agenda. First, it was illegal immigration, then transgender bathrooms. This time, it’s guns.
Earlier this year, the White House announced new policies for those receiving social security benefits in conjunction with the president’s January 5th executive order on gun ownership. When it was released, few seemed to notice that the order allowed the administration to withhold Second Amendment rights from those who collect social security.
The move makes little logical sense. Social Security beneficiaries have never proven themselves as particularly violent or incapable of gun ownership. Instead, it seems as if this is part of Obama’s larger plan to slowly and surreptitiously restrict gun ownership whenever and wherever possible.
The administration was likely hoping that this slow creep of new regulations would go unnoticed until it was too late to be repealed. Fortunately, the watchful eyes of conservative media caught them in the act.
See Obama’s secret gun ban on the next page:
He has to pay for all future foreign voters that he is bringing in the country.
Impeach him already.
B******t !!!!
Buck OFOMA
Bringing the country down to its knees , or will the country bring him down and those who assist him ???
And since I worked in the prison system , so many supposedly ‘Moslems’ came to the chow hall and ate and if they were able to get some extra made themselves sandwiches , males and females .
Traitor.
No. Actually it doesn’t.
Executive Orders don’t mean$#%&!@* Show me the statute in law that will be used. Doesn’t exist. This is all show to look like he’s accomplished something while congress has shut him down. How many bills has he signed into law in his entire second term?
Phillip, you might actually click on the link and others regarding this Executive Order. If you did you would learn that the new law prevents social security recipients who have been documented as being unable to handle their affairs from purchasing a gun. It makes perfect sense to me. If you are unable to manage your own affairs, are you able to own, manage and store a handgun? Probably not. More importantly, are you able to decide when and when not to fire that weapon, whom to point it at, when to use it, etc. if you are unable to manage your affairs due to age or mental issues. Such a law could very well save lives. I hope you agree.