Barack Obama is once again circumventing the legislative process in order to push his administration’s unpopular leftist agenda. First, it was illegal immigration, then transgender bathrooms. This time, it’s guns.
Earlier this year, the White House announced new policies for those receiving social security benefits in conjunction with the president’s January 5th executive order on gun ownership. When it was released, few seemed to notice that the order allowed the administration to withhold Second Amendment rights from those who collect social security.
The move makes little logical sense. Social Security beneficiaries have never proven themselves as particularly violent or incapable of gun ownership. Instead, it seems as if this is part of Obama’s larger plan to slowly and surreptitiously restrict gun ownership whenever and wherever possible.
The administration was likely hoping that this slow creep of new regulations would go unnoticed until it was too late to be repealed. Fortunately, the watchful eyes of conservative media caught them in the act.
See Obama’s secret gun ban on the next page:
Ill ignore this b******t edict, just like all the others
Ah, some more utter b******t from this author. No evidence, no support, no data, but some just lap it up. I would suggest those who think this is true – even if you hate Obama and all things Dem – to ask this poster for ANY evidence for this. Or you can just believe this b******t because you hate dems.
Dale Haynes please speak plain English…that comment is not a word.
Pay back every penny ever borrowed illegally from social security fund. It was not theirs to spend.
It is only partly false…not so much made up as messed up. It is not accurate, here is what snopes.com says (see link in comment below): this is copied and pasted from them: “WHAT’S TRUE: The Obama administration is seeking to use Social Security Administration data about disability recipients to enforce existing gun purchase restrictions.
WHAT’S FALSE: President Obama is planning to bar all Social Security recipients from owning guns.” READ the entire article in the snopes page.
I don’t have to have social security. I do have to have (and always will have) my guns.
The truth is you have tried holding this remarkable President Obama down. Your actions are rude, racist and unsuccessful! Soldier guy seems to have anger issues deeper than this subject…just saying. Don’t like the Republican lead Congress, vote differently.
Obama has had 15 executive orders overturned as unconstitutional by scotus! One more wouldn’t surprise me!
Sue Ketchum as I said this happened in 2014 not now. Also in 2013 both times a meeting took place with supreme court justices and several memebers of Congress. All was pointed out that it was completely illegal and un constitutional to take a right away from anyone that has paid into a system for retirement having had the right to purchase firearms without due process being filed to stop them and just keep the money they paid from them. So agian this is completely false this isn’t a new story this isn’t what they reported in the article and failure to mention the facts in a piece such as this makes conservative news look terriable. I understand your point but even snoops didn’t cover the meetings and out come of them. False story is a false story weather it be partially or mostly false doesn’t make it true.
This pos can’t go fast enough !