Barack Obama is once again circumventing the legislative process in order to push his administration’s unpopular leftist agenda. First, it was illegal immigration, then transgender bathrooms. This time, it’s guns.
Earlier this year, the White House announced new policies for those receiving social security benefits in conjunction with the president’s January 5th executive order on gun ownership. When it was released, few seemed to notice that the order allowed the administration to withhold Second Amendment rights from those who collect social security.
The move makes little logical sense. Social Security beneficiaries have never proven themselves as particularly violent or incapable of gun ownership. Instead, it seems as if this is part of Obama’s larger plan to slowly and surreptitiously restrict gun ownership whenever and wherever possible.
The administration was likely hoping that this slow creep of new regulations would go unnoticed until it was too late to be repealed. Fortunately, the watchful eyes of conservative media caught them in the act.
See Obama’s secret gun ban on the next page:

He’s a punk with a suit,and he manipulates the constitution,cause he has mastered a way to alter the amendments using words that can have a few definitions,and he obviously read a Webster’s dictionary,like a priests reads the bible,,if you dont know that about his b******t ,than you must be a DUMBASS OBAMA lover
!!!!!BETTER NOT!!!!!!!
Katie Vittal another executive order
I love how people like him keep trying to take away OUR guns while he is surrounded by guards with real machine guns and he will be for the rest of his life. Oh and they got AT rockets and AA rockets too (I don’t know if his SS detail will carry them once he is out of office)
Obama’s a basket case a 1 out of 10 at best unfit for the WH and neither is the rest of his ilk they’re all cunts
Ronnie Da Twit, I Crack myself up at times
This gut…
Congress on vacation ALL The Time
Until Congress wakes up and starts working against Obama we have no hope.
Applies to Social Security Disability recipients with mental issues. Does anyone actually read the article?