Barack Obama is once again circumventing the legislative process in order to push his administration’s unpopular leftist agenda. First, it was illegal immigration, then transgender bathrooms. This time, it’s guns.
Earlier this year, the White House announced new policies for those receiving social security benefits in conjunction with the president’s January 5th executive order on gun ownership. When it was released, few seemed to notice that the order allowed the administration to withhold Second Amendment rights from those who collect social security.
The move makes little logical sense. Social Security beneficiaries have never proven themselves as particularly violent or incapable of gun ownership. Instead, it seems as if this is part of Obama’s larger plan to slowly and surreptitiously restrict gun ownership whenever and wherever possible.
The administration was likely hoping that this slow creep of new regulations would go unnoticed until it was too late to be repealed. Fortunately, the watchful eyes of conservative media caught them in the act.
See Obama’s secret gun ban on the next page:
He’s a demon. Wtf
Nonsense. A person on Social Security has a right to protect his wife and family just like Obama required his wife to wear a bullit proof vest when she spoke to the DNC.
Screw this bloody WOG and his agenda!!!!
This dirt bag was never a professor!
Keep pushing you illegal agendas for sooner or later you will p**s off enough Americans to start a revolution and by God I wouldn,t want to be a politician at that point .
seriously ? does he think we do not need a gun for our protection?? we cannot hire armed guards like he has. what is he thinking? we older folks cannot afford assisted living where we might be safe. I know I cannot and I paid the max for my working career.
A president’s Executive Order does not supersede the Constitution. So that do nothing congress needs to get off their asses and do what they took an oath to do, History does repeats it self ie Bunker Hill.
Noah Webster defined: BIG’OT, n.
1. A person who is obstinately and unreasonably wedded to a particular religious creed, opinion, practice or ritual. The word is sometimes used in an enlarged sense, for a person who is illiberally attached to any opinion, or system of belief; as a bigot to the Mohammedan religion; a bigot to a form of government.
)( ILLIB’ERAL, a. [See Liberal.] Not liberal; not free or generous.
1. Not noble; not ingenuous; not catholic; of a contracted mind. Cold in charity; in religion, illiberal.
2. Not candid; uncharitable in judging.
3. Not generous; not munificent; sparing of gifts.
4. Not becoming a well bred man.
5. Not pure; not well authorized or elegant; as illiberal words in Latin.
This is all history when Trump is elected.
JUST 6 MORE MONTHS TO GO, BYE BYE OBAMA YRS, LETS never bring it up ever ever again