UPDATE: We updated this article to address concerns after a reader cited research and recommendations by the fact-checking organization Climate Feedback.
Climate Feedback presented their analysis of our source article, including academic publications by several of its contributors. They concluded the article contained misleading and unsupported details:
Key Take Away
Temperature measurements made with different instruments and methods over time must necessarily be adjusted to ensure high-quality records of temperature that reliably represent changes. The adjustments needed for land stations in the United States often increase the apparent long-term warming, but overall, adjustments actually reduce the global warming trend.
What does an organization do when the real numbers don’t support the agenda they are pushing?
Sometimes they fudge the numbers. Cherry pick what helps prop up the lie and ignore the real facts.
This happens so often that The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration has been doing just that in order to support their biggest science scandal: global warming. Selling their brand of science, their “truth” about global warming brings in extra funding, yet their data is off by 50%.
For the past 18 years, satellites have shown no global warming, where as the “the land based data sets like the ones maintained by NOAA for the US Historical Climate Network (USHCN) continue to show a warming trend.” How can this be?
One explanation, by meteorologist Anthony Watts, shows NOAA using readings from areas that experience Urban Heat Island effect, that is instruments surrounded by buildings, roads or airports nearby which raises the temperatures due to local “environment” and not climate or weather.
Read more on the next page.
And if you like your healthcare plan you can keep it…period…you stupid american voters
don’t figure with a moron of a president and an oxy moron of an ex vice president
Old news, scientists frequently skew or create “facts” or theoris to continue receiving funding, in this case; from our Federal Government..Certain “scientists” have practiced this highly unethical behavior for centuries…
It is an infuriating scam
Well, they gotta’ do something in order to get funding. I mean it is the National Oceanic And Atmospheric Administration. Where do you think “global warming” came from? Cause surely it is not real
So prove it. Otherwise how is s tax scheme and powergrab going to fix it?
are you trying to tell me we are doing that while you use false data !!!
I’m having a real hard time trying to put things in a way you simple people can understand. so I’ll say it again cause ive noticed with my 4 year old nephew I need to repeat things a lot, and let’s be honest you guys are almost as smart as him but not really. and your “prove it” argument is about as low of an intelligence as his is because you know that I clearly can not prove things physically but you wanted to attempt to call me out too but were unable to do so because like Larry and bob you neglected to answer a very simple question. do you think that doing those things will have absolutely no adverse effects?
NONE make it work!! spain lost twice as many jobs as were created when they tried it. Solar is still only 20% effective and has a EOL of 25 years, it is also destroying the environment. Windmills kill hundreds of eagles every year but are given an exemption because it meets the low Iq liberals Idea of doing good. The head of the weather channel even says it is BS and he has an entire department of scientists behind him. The only scientist backing it are those paid by the governments and those in universities that are afraid of losing their grants. NASA data doesn’t lie !. The cleanest most effective alternative source is nuclear but somebodies grandma was scarred by the attack of the killer tomatoes so we can’t use that.
No bias on that website at all. Truth and action #1 domestic terrorist Facebook page