Of all the media outlets denying the fact that the Obama administration illegally spied on the Trump campaign, the most hypocritical might be the New York Times. Before Donald Trump ever mentioned the apparent wiretapping, the Times published a story that would corroborate the president’s claims.
On January 20th, the Times innocuously outed the existence of wiretapped data collected by the Obama administration:
The F.B.I. is leading the investigations [of Paul Manafort, Carter Page, and Roger Stone], aided by the National Security Agency, the C.I.A. and the Treasury Department’s financial crimes unit. The investigators have accelerated their efforts in recent weeks but have found no conclusive evidence of wrongdoing, the officials said. One official said intelligence reports based on some of the wiretapped communications had been provided to the White House.
Despite their initial reporting, the New York Times has since reversed course — no doubt to remain diametrically opposed to Trump at all times. Now they claim no such surveillance occurred.
Read their latest spin regarding the story on the next page:
Excellent that you pulled in that other ny times piece. and great timing in getting priority pieces done as of late.
Ahhhhhhh… the NY Crimes !!
and we’re supposed to bow to what a dilapidated newspaper thinks or says.. Hello they don’t’ know what real research is anymore.
But they do so how did they get it
I have no evidence the NYT is an honest, journalistic organization.
LOL–they gave him the proof.
Sorry but they are not a newspaper and are full of poo poo, They are nothing more than a rag like the enquirer.
They couldn’t print the trueth if they had video!
BS
F**e news