There is more scientific proof suggesting Building 7 was destroyed by controlled demolition than the resulting fires from the debris.
A new scientific study found the official story surrounding 9/11 was not compatible with the laws of physics. Several studies have already reached similar conclusions. However, this is the 1st to provide the long-awaited definitive answers.
The new study conducted at the University of Alaska Fairbanks took things one step further – we now know with a high degree of scientific accuracy that the official NIST explanation of how the World Trade Center 7 building collapsed is not only suspect, it’s 100% false, according to the findings of this academic study.
This study replicated and remodeled every factor relating to that infamous day involving building 7. Complete study results and the undeniable scientific evidence indicating Building 7 was a deliberate job on the next page:
You know nothing more than the general public knows. I am prior military and definitely not anti government. I never said the government was responsible. I only said those 2 planes were not responsible for bringing down those “3” buildings period!!
This rhetoric is tired, old, unproven BS. Grow up and do something useful like trying to stop the Obama created riots going on all over the country.
Bull$#%&!@*
I’m calling b******t. It seems unexplainable. Sometimes$#%&!@*is unexplainable. Why does the video jump cut as soon as column 79 is mentioned? CNN doesn’t the same$#%&!@*
The important question is why?
Wait!!!! Don’t tell me, the planes were flown by remote control, right? At last we know the truth!!!!!
Absolutely ridiculous!!!
Hah…not
Can you explain how the BBC was able to report this building collapsing 20 minutes before it happened, if it wasn’t a controlled demolition?
just build a giant tower with dominos and try one million times to bring it straight down….never happen brother but you can try
B******t..the towers went down in the same way.