There is more scientific proof suggesting Building 7 was destroyed by controlled demolition than the resulting fires from the debris.
A new scientific study found the official story surrounding 9/11 was not compatible with the laws of physics. Several studies have already reached similar conclusions. However, this is the 1st to provide the long-awaited definitive answers.
The new study conducted at the University of Alaska Fairbanks took things one step further – we now know with a high degree of scientific accuracy that the official NIST explanation of how the World Trade Center 7 building collapsed is not only suspect, it’s 100% false, according to the findings of this academic study.
This study replicated and remodeled every factor relating to that infamous day involving building 7. Complete study results and the undeniable scientific evidence indicating Building 7 was a deliberate job on the next page:
As were buildings 1 & 2…
Kimmie Sallows maybe obamas govt and Hilliary govt (IF she had won–which thankfully she didn’t) wanted a third world country, but then that’s one of the reasons we elected Trump, because he doesn’t want a third world country!
Most of the substance of the towers is turned to dust before it hit the ground. Even the steel beams. The dust does not burn people so it is not thermite induced destruction. This is weaponized free energy in the form of a Magnetic Electro Gravitic Nuclear Reaction. All metal is destroyed by cold fusion. Very little metal including steel was seen at ground zero. Consider how big those buildings (All of the buildings which was like 5 or 6 building not just 2 0r 3) and only that much debris was left. This did not happen because of a couple of planes. Cars and buses melted over 2 miles away. Engines were missing just powder where engines had been but trees between the towers and the melted cars were intact and green not burnt. Where did all the file cabinets go and where did all the desks go??? they were made of metal and turned to dust. Look up a book titled Where Did the Towers Go? by Judy Wood she is a M.A. PhD etc. This all goes back to TESLA and free energy patents of 100 years ago. Was very interesting and factually accurate.
Gail Reiber might I ask you why did you say in a sarcastic way, that you think I take some serious drugs? Then your last comment looks as if you like Trump. I myself like Trump, and love what he’s doing.
The people that believe this don’t really know very much about the physics and work that goes into a controlled demolition.
It isn’t simply “put in some explosives.”
Idiots say anything for attention
Seek help
What ludicrosity. Stupid, stupid, stupid.
Your a fucking idiot
I believe it