There is more scientific proof suggesting Building 7 was destroyed by controlled demolition than the resulting fires from the debris.
A new scientific study found the official story surrounding 9/11 was not compatible with the laws of physics. Several studies have already reached similar conclusions. However, this is the 1st to provide the long-awaited definitive answers.
The new study conducted at the University of Alaska Fairbanks took things one step further – we now know with a high degree of scientific accuracy that the official NIST explanation of how the World Trade Center 7 building collapsed is not only suspect, it’s 100% false, according to the findings of this academic study.
This study replicated and remodeled every factor relating to that infamous day involving building 7. Complete study results and the undeniable scientific evidence indicating Building 7 was a deliberate job on the next page:
Matthew Rose You are a complete shitter and an idiot. The building was crushed by the tower when it fell and then burned for seven hours. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PFoarqaNjL8
I think anyone with a brain in their head knew this a long time ago!!!! Bloody idiots!!!
Samuel Johnson Another$#%&!@*internet engineer.
Idiots are the ones who use an apostrophe to pluralize, idiot. Oh, and 9/11 happened and it was not staged bybthe US government. Every pathetic attempt to prove otherwise has been debunked beyond convincingly. Grow a brain.
Supposedly no airplane debris could be seen at the site at all. It was to hit the secured room that had proof of where all that money went. You know that mysteriously disappeared from the Pentagon. Never heard any more about trillions of $ after 9/11. It’s like it never happened. Weird huh.?
You fucking conspiracy nuts only prove one thing over and over- you have very low intelligence, not training or experience and don’t have a fucking clue to what you are talking about. Even if I WANTED to believe the government pulled this off, there are so many impossibilities involved that it would have failed from the start. Shitters
Yeah, it had nothing to do with the huge plane sized gaping holes in the structure of the buildings. Fucking idiots….
Liberal idiots and your conspiracy theory ! Steel when heated loses its strength.how do you think they shaoe steel ? With heat ! With all that jet fuel burnig the temperature was well above the 1300 degrees need to weaken the steel supports in the area of the crash witch would collapse under the weight of the floors above the crash causing the whole building to collapse.
Study proves there’s idiots who believe this garbage
The building was unstable after the twin towers fell so YES – morons, the demolished it. This is a practice frequently done to buildings when they are no longer useful and newer buildings are built under newer safer codes. Here’s a little more info – the old AT&T building – 195 Broadway – was unharmed. That’s my building directly in front of the towers.