There is more scientific proof suggesting Building 7 was destroyed by controlled demolition than the resulting fires from the debris.
A new scientific study found the official story surrounding 9/11 was not compatible with the laws of physics. Several studies have already reached similar conclusions. However, this is the 1st to provide the long-awaited definitive answers.
The new study conducted at the University of Alaska Fairbanks took things one step further – we now know with a high degree of scientific accuracy that the official NIST explanation of how the World Trade Center 7 building collapsed is not only suspect, it’s 100% false, according to the findings of this academic study.
This study replicated and remodeled every factor relating to that infamous day involving building 7. Complete study results and the undeniable scientific evidence indicating Building 7 was a deliberate job on the next page:
B******T
All the security cameras .. and no pictures of a plane hitting the Pentagon !!!
Stephen H. Jones About twenty years ago near Roselawn Indiana, a plane went down, and only small body parts, and plane parts were found. I knew firemen who went to the scene.
Lmao
Kimmie Sallows …I think you take some serious drugs…
Your theory is so stupid that I’m sure you’re the reason there has to be directions on shampoo!
Everyone that commented on my statement missed it. “Why did it have to be demo’d” because of the towers falling when other buildings the same distance and just as old did not?
I personally saw the 2nd airplane fly over NJ and turn North to crash into the tower, all from the east facing Watchung mountain. It was not faked !
…hmmmm. And what happened to the people on the jet (your so-called guided missile) that hit the pentagon?… just askin’
Julie…your scaring even me