There is more scientific proof suggesting Building 7 was destroyed by controlled demolition than the resulting fires from the debris.
A new scientific study found the official story surrounding 9/11 was not compatible with the laws of physics. Several studies have already reached similar conclusions. However, this is the 1st to provide the long-awaited definitive answers.
The new study conducted at the University of Alaska Fairbanks took things one step further – we now know with a high degree of scientific accuracy that the official NIST explanation of how the World Trade Center 7 building collapsed is not only suspect, it’s 100% false, according to the findings of this academic study.
This study replicated and remodeled every factor relating to that infamous day involving building 7. Complete study results and the undeniable scientific evidence indicating Building 7 was a deliberate job on the next page:
B******t! I saw the planes fly into the building! No one is stupid enough to believe your c**p
There are some mentally retarded people who actually believe this b******t!
Wyatt Blackwood we watched that on Amazon. They pretty much removed all doubt about the planned demolition.
There is another show about the Pennsylvania crash. Ever seen a plane crash site where ALL of the debris is small bits? No wing debris, no engine debris, no tail debris? EVER?
So, tell me something I didn’t know.
So was the twin towers.
And the planes we all saw on TV hitting the buildings were halograms projected into the sky by the government. Nutjobs!!!
Just keep your head in the sand. Life is less complicated that way.
Oh in the same day? Building 7 fell at 5 21 pm Sept 11 2001
They heard explosions because 2 planes flew into the world trade center and exploded. Evidently you have never been around a plane crash before, I was in the Air Force and saw a KC 135 crash and there were several explosions for about 2 or 3 hours after the crash so that doesn’t surprise me that they heard explosions.
Bull