There is more scientific proof suggesting Building 7 was destroyed by controlled demolition than the resulting fires from the debris.
A new scientific study found the official story surrounding 9/11 was not compatible with the laws of physics. Several studies have already reached similar conclusions. However, this is the 1st to provide the long-awaited definitive answers.
The new study conducted at the University of Alaska Fairbanks took things one step further – we now know with a high degree of scientific accuracy that the official NIST explanation of how the World Trade Center 7 building collapsed is not only suspect, it’s 100% false, according to the findings of this academic study.
This study replicated and remodeled every factor relating to that infamous day involving building 7. Complete study results and the undeniable scientific evidence indicating Building 7 was a deliberate job on the next page:
Oh I agree, It was planned by the Trolls who live under the seventh street bridge because they were upset with all the traffic going over the bridge. or maybe the Aliens from outer space got away from Hanger 18 on WPAFB, OH and they did it or …. just plain bull c**p
Imagine if you will, a conspiracy so big that no one has came out and say anything. You people are fucking crazy.
You need to buy a better grade of drugs
Dave Richardson you believe what you want, I believe what I saw as it was happening before yokels had a chance photoshop !!
Your a dumb$#%&!@*clown
Don’t you think Obama would have brought this to the public if it was true?
To think that our government is good enough to pull that off is the stupidest thing I can think of. How did they hide the truth for 16 years? You do relaize it would take billions of dollars to keep it quiet all these years. And to have the efficiency to pull itoff in the first place. I can’t think of anyone in our government good enough. To think obama wouldn’t have exposed that so he could blame Bush for another thing. Bliss, so much bliss.
If the author of this article had taken the time to check spelling and grammar prior to oublicstion I could take this more seriously. Lack of proper spelling and grammar speaks for itself. Stupid.
As an engineer, I laugh at things like this
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2010/06/hey_911_truthers_is_this_a_con.html