There is more scientific proof suggesting Building 7 was destroyed by controlled demolition than the resulting fires from the debris.
A new scientific study found the official story surrounding 9/11 was not compatible with the laws of physics. Several studies have already reached similar conclusions. However, this is the 1st to provide the long-awaited definitive answers.
The new study conducted at the University of Alaska Fairbanks took things one step further – we now know with a high degree of scientific accuracy that the official NIST explanation of how the World Trade Center 7 building collapsed is not only suspect, it’s 100% false, according to the findings of this academic study.
This study replicated and remodeled every factor relating to that infamous day involving building 7. Complete study results and the undeniable scientific evidence indicating Building 7 was a deliberate job on the next page:
Asbestos? That’s a new one.
Do some research….. It is impossible to hit the Pentagon the way that your government is telling you…..
Samuel Johnson if u ever took the time to see how these buildings were designed you would see that the outside wall and the lift shafts held the floors up.
Put to much weight on the floors ie 20 floors abouve with no support bang the house of cards tumble.
Did we really? Ever heard of photoshop?
this humors me
Buddy Wightman it hurts my head all these people blaming everyone and there aunty rather than who did it.
So were the two towers. All three buildings were a controlled demolition.
Ya thats why it fell straight down, by controlled demolition plus the building was full of evidence and had to come down
Sorry John it was George Bush every Sunday with a backpack filled with TNT like in the cartoons that did it , so a guy in the pub told me.
Jim Brooks building codes and what it was like in structure was no longer safe. Others built to better codes and safer.