There is more scientific proof suggesting Building 7 was destroyed by controlled demolition than the resulting fires from the debris.
A new scientific study found the official story surrounding 9/11 was not compatible with the laws of physics. Several studies have already reached similar conclusions. However, this is the 1st to provide the long-awaited definitive answers.
The new study conducted at the University of Alaska Fairbanks took things one step further – we now know with a high degree of scientific accuracy that the official NIST explanation of how the World Trade Center 7 building collapsed is not only suspect, it’s 100% false, according to the findings of this academic study.
This study replicated and remodeled every factor relating to that infamous day involving building 7. Complete study results and the undeniable scientific evidence indicating Building 7 was a deliberate job on the next page:
wow kimmie! gotta go with morten stang on this one. are you a fuckin retard? did you do any credible research on this? hint: MIT along with popular science and popular mechanics did a study on this and they dont agree with you.
That would be the republicans John
Oh shut up you conspiracy fruitcakes!!!!!
That would be the republicans John
Not buying any of this garbage. The towers fell
As they did due to the fact that the asbestos protection on the girders was removed according to building codes.
Those planes may of hit the trade centers but they were carrying a ton of explosives to do that much damage.
Nuts!!
all three came down with demolitions…..
The third tower! Fishy!
The owner of the building was losing money because tenants were vacating due to asbestos, after insurance paid he received a lot more than he paid for it