There is more scientific proof suggesting Building 7 was destroyed by controlled demolition than the resulting fires from the debris.
A new scientific study found the official story surrounding 9/11 was not compatible with the laws of physics. Several studies have already reached similar conclusions. However, this is the 1st to provide the long-awaited definitive answers.
The new study conducted at the University of Alaska Fairbanks took things one step further – we now know with a high degree of scientific accuracy that the official NIST explanation of how the World Trade Center 7 building collapsed is not only suspect, it’s 100% false, according to the findings of this academic study.
This study replicated and remodeled every factor relating to that infamous day involving building 7. Complete study results and the undeniable scientific evidence indicating Building 7 was a deliberate job on the next page:
F**e! If not it’s b******t that these imbicles believe!
Conttsry to thst clown eomen on tv who said steel does not melt by fire
.
Steel indeed melts by fire if the heat is sufficient
If true we need to know the. Complete truth and who was really behind it!
Would like to see proof on these charges!
An controlled demolition is time consuming but an implosion happend in seconds
Thank you Captain Obvious!
Joe Fleck
You can’t see much of anything with your head buried in the sand!!
Over 30 years ago, I was told that a nuclear reactor could stand up to a 747 loaded with fuel hitting it. The towers were not as reinforced and could allow an aircraft to penetrate the interior due to large areas of glass. The real mystery is how any plane got close enough to hit the Pentagon.
They didn’t say the planes didn’t hit. They said they had help bringing the buildings down. If it wasn’t a control explosions they wouldn’t have fallen straight down.
All three buildings were blown up by implosions