There is more scientific proof suggesting Building 7 was destroyed by controlled demolition than the resulting fires from the debris.
A new scientific study found the official story surrounding 9/11 was not compatible with the laws of physics. Several studies have already reached similar conclusions. However, this is the 1st to provide the long-awaited definitive answers.
The new study conducted at the University of Alaska Fairbanks took things one step further – we now know with a high degree of scientific accuracy that the official NIST explanation of how the World Trade Center 7 building collapsed is not only suspect, it’s 100% false, according to the findings of this academic study.
This study replicated and remodeled every factor relating to that infamous day involving building 7. Complete study results and the undeniable scientific evidence indicating Building 7 was a deliberate job on the next page:
George William Rose i say he did it for the oil over there. Remember the mass weapons of destruction they had that were never really there.
B******t garbage in this page…deleting it!
Diane-John Iwanowycz
Why? Why would someone be so disrespectful of this horrifying time and the memory of those affected! Shame on you!
Conspiracy theories have been around a long time, and as long as there are people with different points of views, we always will! We will also have those few that always think the worst of their country, so until there is positive proof, I just ignore them!
Ya..the terrorist in our own gov.
What was in building 7?
Proof is out there.
Seen enough of this stupid$#%&!@* Go suck one, T&A
James Roberts don’t waste my time, show us where Trump said that, never happened! You’re not bullshitting a liberal here, you need facts supported with proof! Trump isn’t an engineer and couldn’t and wouldn’t say that, but thank you for your comment!