There is more scientific proof suggesting Building 7 was destroyed by controlled demolition than the resulting fires from the debris.
A new scientific study found the official story surrounding 9/11 was not compatible with the laws of physics. Several studies have already reached similar conclusions. However, this is the 1st to provide the long-awaited definitive answers.
The new study conducted at the University of Alaska Fairbanks took things one step further – we now know with a high degree of scientific accuracy that the official NIST explanation of how the World Trade Center 7 building collapsed is not only suspect, it’s 100% false, according to the findings of this academic study.
This study replicated and remodeled every factor relating to that infamous day involving building 7. Complete study results and the undeniable scientific evidence indicating Building 7 was a deliberate job on the next page:
Mr. Silverstein purchased the property 6 weeks before 9/11. He doubled the insurance coverage and had it transferred to a cash payout plan. This is all documented. Check for yourself. I have done my research. Don’t talk down to me like you need to make things simple for me to understand….you don’t know me.
ABSOLUTE C**P THE BEST SAMPLE OF F**E NEWS.
When you watch drilling rigs catch afire and it’s so hot that hundred of tons of metal blows away like paper ash it has a whole new meaning to melting
Search Key words : pull building seven.
#HippieBullshit/$#%&!@*post
Moron Witch
What c**p!
You can’t believe that!
There aren’t enough facts on any side to believe any story. Just poking. However, there is no reason building seven was damaged enough to collapse just as the other building did. This is fact. It was blown up with Giuliani’s go ahead. Demolitions take weeks, to months to set up. They did it in hours, with all the other chaos going on.
Pure Horseshit.