There is more scientific proof suggesting Building 7 was destroyed by controlled demolition than the resulting fires from the debris.
A new scientific study found the official story surrounding 9/11 was not compatible with the laws of physics. Several studies have already reached similar conclusions. However, this is the 1st to provide the long-awaited definitive answers.
The new study conducted at the University of Alaska Fairbanks took things one step further – we now know with a high degree of scientific accuracy that the official NIST explanation of how the World Trade Center 7 building collapsed is not only suspect, it’s 100% false, according to the findings of this academic study.
This study replicated and remodeled every factor relating to that infamous day involving building 7. Complete study results and the undeniable scientific evidence indicating Building 7 was a deliberate job on the next page:
Know it’s a little bare bones, and a little torn in approach, but this is what has worked well in the past. It’s actually a bit of an art form to be cocky to the point of evoking people’s interest and wrath while also giving virtually no personal opinion lol
No and no. F**e divisive news.
F**k off
Give it a fuckin rest!
Oh for crying out loud not this$#%&!@*again!!
and if they actually watched the towers fall in slow motion it would be also proven that they fell with a controlled demolition … but too many people are blind to see it too … and the pentagon got hit by a guided missle !!!
And Godzilla was behind Pearl Harbor
Lance Riley
F**e
Sheep don’t need truth to pay taxes.