A new 3-dimensional computer model simulated the alleged plane strike to the World Trade Center’s North Tower exactly as reported according to the 911 commission report.
These findings give a very vivid depiction as to how the Sept. 11th attack looks according to the official reports. Except unlike most simulations, this 3D model raises more questions than it answers.
The simulation carefully reproduces in 3D the entire airspace surrounding the North Tower of the World Trade Center as it stood before the attack on Sept. 11th, 2011. According to the official Commission, one of the attackers flew a Boeing 747 into the north face of the tower.
Official reports state that the buildings collapsed due to the heat and fires generated from the two planes crashing into the side of the buildings.
53 video clips were compiled by lead researcher Richard D. Hall into a 1-minute presentation to analyze if the footage was shown on the news the day of the attack aligned with the “official flight path”.
Learn more about this new investigation and watch the 3D simulation on the next page
Zel Shiro really? Is that how you think it works with insurance??? Hahahahahahahahaha. Your an idiot
Zel Shiro if my 99 7.3 diesel gets totalled I don’t get a check for what a brand new 6.7 limited cost….. seriously your an idiot.
So debris from tower one flew over another building into building 7…. hahahahhaha. Gravity doesn’t work like that. Wow
What part of jet fuel and diesel fuel not burning do you retards not get???? Planes or generators, that fuel will not burn in a regular fire so can it about the fuel.
And you still havent explained why the central core on both buildings completely disappeared…. lol.
I’m not an engineer, just been in thmy demo business a very long time and know what it takes to bring a building down.
When the first attack on the twin towers happened in the 90s how many of the columns where blown away in the basement and those towers still stood so I don’t give two shits about your bs theories of a 747 being able to completely obliterate several floors and cause them to collapse. Not when the engineers of the building have said repeatedly that the towers where designed to take hits from even larger planes.
And even if the support beams your claiming collapsed it wouldn’t bring the entire building down perfectly like that. I know, we’ve done it many many times taking buildings down.
One argument that eludes folks who believe these were 767’s, is physics, pure and simple. They categorically can not fly at 583 mph at sea level. Checkmate.
https://youtu.be/7nL10C7FSbE
Now what?
So based on your theory it’s safe to assume building 6 fell completely to the ground too huh. Sure doesn’t look that way.