A new 3-dimensional computer model simulated the alleged plane strike to the World Trade Center’s North Tower exactly as reported according to the 911 commission report.
These findings give a very vivid depiction as to how the Sept. 11th attack looks according to the official reports. Except unlike most simulations, this 3D model raises more questions than it answers.
The simulation carefully reproduces in 3D the entire airspace surrounding the North Tower of the World Trade Center as it stood before the attack on Sept. 11th, 2011. According to the official Commission, one of the attackers flew a Boeing 747 into the north face of the tower.
Official reports state that the buildings collapsed due to the heat and fires generated from the two planes crashing into the side of the buildings.
53 video clips were compiled by lead researcher Richard D. Hall into a 1-minute presentation to analyze if the footage was shown on the news the day of the attack aligned with the “official flight path”.
Learn more about this new investigation and watch the 3D simulation on the next page
I dunno the same way Area 51 was. The same way the manhattan project was….
People actually believe that tell us everything… lol. That’s cute.
https://youtu.be/-jPzAakHPpk
Don’t bother trying to reason with the idiots dude…
Because no passenger airline hit the pentagon. Lol. Titanium engines that weigh tons don’t vaporize. $#%&!@*even the damn concrete truck that mythbuster blew up with thousands of pounds of explosives left debris behind to tell it was a truck.
That section of the pentagon that was hit happen to be the same section that held documents regarding the missing billions of dollars, remember???
The pentagon has cameras all over, they only showed a fire ball in a very slow frame rate camera and anyone who believes that’s the kind of technology the pentagon uses… lol. Gullible.
Hours after the pentagon was hit they started bringing in truck loads of dirt to cover everything up, why????? You can see government employees picking up little pieces of metal. You can see a small 2foot jet engine in one of the pictures also.
And let’s not forget the fact that the supposed trajectory didn’t knock any light poles down… tricky tricky…
Building 7…. the worse excuse (lie) ever.
https://youtu.be/-jPzAakHPpk
Building 7…. the worse excuse (lie) ever.
https://youtu.be/-jPzAakHPpk
Cell signals spread in all directions, including up, and most commercial airlines have wifi available on board. Your arguments are about as lame as your theory. I work in structural design and inspections. I am tired of hearing “it had to be rigged with bombs. It is completely possible for those buildings to have collapsed without any extra help from below. That can be backed up by every structural engineer I have worked with.
How many fire fighters can wire up a burning building in a matter of a couple hours to bring it down…
Steel buildings don’t collapse because of fire, it’s never happened. EVER! The building in London just burned like crazy for a day and didn’t budge an inch.
Building 7…. the worse excuse (lie) ever. How many fire fighters know how to wire up a building and bring it down perfectly in a couple hours. While it’s burning so bad that they can’t save it…. lol.
Lots of gullible people here.
Building 7…. the worse excuse (lie) ever.
https://youtu.be/-jPzAakHPpk
https://youtu.be/-jPzAakHPpk
Building 7…. the worse excuse (lie) ever. How many fire fighters know how to wire up a building and bring it down perfectly in a couple hours. While it’s burning so bad that they can’t save it…. lol.
Lots of gullible people here.
https://youtu.be/-jPzAakHPpk