A new 3-dimensional computer model simulated the alleged plane strike to the World Trade Center’s North Tower exactly as reported according to the 911 commission report.
These findings give a very vivid depiction as to how the Sept. 11th attack looks according to the official reports. Except unlike most simulations, this 3D model raises more questions than it answers.
The simulation carefully reproduces in 3D the entire airspace surrounding the North Tower of the World Trade Center as it stood before the attack on Sept. 11th, 2011. According to the official Commission, one of the attackers flew a Boeing 747 into the north face of the tower.
Official reports state that the buildings collapsed due to the heat and fires generated from the two planes crashing into the side of the buildings.
53 video clips were compiled by lead researcher Richard D. Hall into a 1-minute presentation to analyze if the footage was shown on the news the day of the attack aligned with the “official flight path”.
Learn more about this new investigation and watch the 3D simulation on the next page
Eric, what does that mean?
he must think we’re all stupid…the portion of the wings that hold the engines have to be stronger than he portrayed…and the entire length of the wings is not indicated by the hole left in the building
Tell that to the familrs that lost their loved ones n got calls from them right b4 the PLANE crashed into the towers..Only an idiot would believe this b******t
it was videotaped by many people…it was planes!..idiots…and we all know how reliable eye witnesses are, lol
Joel Albert The most obvious in your face detail everyone forgets or doesn’t realize is Tower 1 was hit first but fell second..The Wtc building 2 fell first but was 2nd hit 17 minutes apart from Wtc Tower 1 being hit first,,They messed up big time it doesn’t add up…So sloppy..And the first hit on Tower 1 was a more solid direct hit Tower 1 should have gone down first, jet fuel theory was utilized the most on that impact, where when tower 2 was hit it was a side glancing blow with most of the jet fuel burning off in the explosion on impact…That is right.. There goes the jet fuel theory if most of it burned off on the initial explosion, that is just common sense.. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ZlPHCxSooo
there’s a very good reason why video footage would not be widely available…duh…it’s the pentagon
Debunking Jet fuel theory is easy..The most obvious in your face detail everyone forgets or doesn’t realize is Tower 1 was hit first but fell second..The Wtc building 2 fell first but was 2nd hit 17 minutes apart from Wtc Tower 1 being hit first,,They messed up big time it doesn’t add up…So sloppy..And the first hit on Tower 1 was a more solid direct hit Tower 1 should have gone down first, jet fuel theory was utilized the most on that impact, where when tower 2 was hit it was a side glancing blow with most of the jet fuel burning off in the explosion on impact…That is right.. There goes the jet fuel theory if most of it burned off on the initial explosion, that is just common sense.. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ZlPHCxSooo MD1nyc<-------(
Your an idiot.
Didn’t realize I needed to have my tinfoil hat handy for this group. Unfollowing.
Is this f**e news from the tight now.