Helicopter parents do not microchip your children. No matter who argues it is for the safety of your offspring, it most certainly is not, but more of a devious plot to have a life-long tracking device implanted under their young skin.
Many would make the claim that if one’s child gets lost or runs away, a microchip would help the police find said lost child, yet the dangers of having access to one’s whereabouts 24/7 are more threatening than the possibility that you will lose your child.
Most of us, at one point in our lives, were separated in a store from out parents, and we not only survived, but also learned the skills of staying in place until we were found. Yet in today’s paranoid society, (yes there most certainly are creeps out there, just look at Target’s recent record), the idea of letting your child become a human tracking device is unacceptable.
This idea of a chip has been discussed for years and humans have been experimented upon in recent days, but there is a sinister design behind the idea.
One example of the sinister was reported by Truth and Action, when “former DARPA director and now Google executive, Regina Dugan, was (sic) promoting an edible “authentication microchip” and an electronic tattoo that can read your mind.
“This pill has a small chip inside of it with a switch,” said Dugan. “It also has what amounts to an inside out potato battery. When you swallow it, the acids in your stomach serve as the electrolyte and that powers it up. And the switch goes on and off and creates an 18 bit ECG wide signal in your body and essentially your entire body becomes your authentication token.”
Read about the dangers of implanting one’s children and other diabolical implants on the next page.
The “mark of the beast”?
It is all about control of the population. They could do anything they want to your child through that chip and you would have no way to fight it.
Mark of the beast. Pretty soon, no one will be able to buy/sell/trade without a chip.
Guamanolie
I will put micro-chip on evils. It’s more nice and easy they will accept for sure
Do they have a death wish? Because messing with my boys is a sure ticket to a dirt nap.
Umm, this,” National Medical Device Registry from H.R. 3200 [Healthcare Bill], pages 1001-1008: (g)(1) The Secretary shall establish a national medical device registry (in this subsection referred to as the ‘registry’) to facilitate analysis of postmarket safety and outcomes data on each device that— ‘‘(A) is or has been used in or on a patient; ‘‘(B)and is— ‘‘(i) a class III device; or ‘‘(ii) a class II device that is implantable, life-supporting, or life-sustaining.” Does not in any way say if you don’t get a chip implanted you aren’t eligible for Obamacare, it says that there will be a registry for all devices that can or have been used inside or on a human body. It doesn’t in any way say people have to have them, it says any devices like that, including say pacemakers or even hearing aids, would be subject to a registry. Reading comprehension for the win here people. You almost have to be a non-English speaker to get anything approaching that this somehow says everyone will have to be implanted.
Hope it comes with guacamole !
No, but we sure love your generalizations. It’s almost as if you’re bigoted. It’s comical.
If you don’t want to accept the mainstream portrayal of your label, then don’t accept a mainstream label.