Clinton Clearly Indictable, Too Prominant
The newly obtained documents are “statements of the case” against Clinton and Webster Lee “Webb” Hubbell, Coninton’s former law partner and former Assiciate Attorney General in the Clinton Justice Department.
The records released today by Judicial Watch were prepared for an “All OIC Attorneys” meeting on April 27, 1998, at which a final decision about whether to indict Clinton and Hubbell was the subject of a lengthy debate. The records explore in detail the role Clinton played in the fraudulent Castle Grande transaction, the role of Madison Guaranty Savings & Loan, and the subsequent lengthy cover-up as the Clintons sought and won the White House.
Clinton, according to prosecutors, drafted an option agreement that concealed from federal bank examiners a fraudulent $300,000 cross-loan in the Castle Grande transaction. Her concealment of her role in this fraudulent transaction, including the hiding of her Rose Law Firm billing records concerning her legal work for Madison, were the subject of an OIC obstruction of justice probe.
The 1998 memoranda include substantial evidence depicting Clinton and her former Rose Law Firm partners—Hubbell, and Vincent Foster, both of whom went on to senior positions in the Bill Clinton presidency—as complicit in activities that “facilitated crimes.”
The National Archives is withholding additional documents Judicial Watch believes to be critical to understanding Clinton’s full role in the Whitewater scandal.
On March 9, 2015, Judicial Watch submitted a FOIA request seeking all draft indictments of Clinton in the files of Hickman Ewing Jr., who served as deputy independent counsel in the Whitewater probe. In 1999, Ewing testified that he wrote a draft indictment of Clinton.
Ultimately, as an April 24, 1998, memo suggests, prosecutors were persuaded that a jury would not convict Clinton based upon circumstantial evidence. OIC attorney Paul Rosenzweig wrote:
In a high profile case of this sort, however, I think that some jurors are likely to put OIC to the full measure of proof beyond a reasonable doubt and, in effect, insist that circumstantial evidence is an inferior form of evidence on which they cannot convict. Such a distinction would be “lawless” in a formal sense, as contrary to their jury instructions – but we blink reality if we do not expect this reaction to a primarily circumstantial high profile case.
“These new Hillary Clinton prosecution memos are damning and dramatic,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “Hillary Clinton’s bank fraud, obstruction, lies, and other fraud began in Arkansas, continued in the White House and actually accelerated because the suicide of her friend Vincent Foster. The memos suggest that if she weren’t First Lady, she would have been successfully prosecuted in federal court. As we continue the court fight to get the actual draft indictment of Hillary Clinton we first uncovered in this investigation, Americans would do well to read these memos. If you want to understand the deplorable ethics and corruption at the Clinton State Department, these documents provide important background.”
It is clear that Hillary Clinton will do whatever it takes to obtain her ambitions, and that breaking the law, hiding evidence and perjuring herself are but a minor examples of her personal ethics and belief system. More damning is that government officials and Democrat party members are willing to facilitate and support a government official and ensure that they do not pay the price for their crimes, crimes which the ordinary citizen would spend many years in prison for undertaking.
These crimes and years long practices are well known to political insiders, and yet it seems that Clinton will never be held responsible for her felonious conduct, and in fact may even be elected to the White House!
One of the Founding Fathers once said that America would cease being great if she ceased being good. Sadly, that day is here, and Hillary Clinton is the very embodiment of that declaration.
Source: judicialwatch.org
What else is she going to do to convince them what kind of person she is! A liar and a criminal…
This information is not new. It was made public years ago. I looked at the originals and they don’t implicate Hillary at all. In fact, it provides exculpatory evidence. Hickman Ewing, who was as dishonest and unethical as they come,.leaked cherry-picked portions to the media. It appears that Judicial Watch is trying to do the same thing- and disingenuously is calling it “new.”