The supposedly transparent and ethical Democrats have been shown to be dishonest, conniving hypocrites by the email releases published by Wikileaks. Hillary Clinton took the opportunity to hide and delete about 30,000 emails from her server of the total 60,000 that were sent during her time as Secretary of State, and somehow we are asked to believe that the half she deleted were non-incriminating, benign missives about yoga workouts and her daughters wedding plans. Half of the U.S. population bought that preposterous story, even when the other 30,000 emails, which she also tried to hide, were shown to be highly incriminating and damaging to the country.
The Wikileaks emails were generated by the Democrat National Committee, and they did not have a chance to delete or hide the content. Their posture is that the release is outrageous and unfair, and therefore we should dismiss the actual content. That is not playing well with the public, and the leaks reveal some very unflattering facts about the Democrats.
See what was revealed about the Democrats in Wikileaks releases on page 2:
who me or you
https://l.facebook.com/l.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fyoutu.be%2FvQ1Udo-BR7Q&h=6AQHMEQsm
Of course…..they are cheats and liers.
why can’t this be fixed so it will not happen again. when a city of 40,000 show they voted and the population of that city is only 14,000 the poles need to be checked and recount the votes by hand. go trump
Par for the course
Snakes the whole lot of them
How is it, that in amerika, the sludge at the bottom of the barrel rises to the top?
Under Federal Law: Title 18. Section 2071
Can it be any clearer?
Former United States Attorney General Michael Mukasey tells MSNBC that not only is Hillary Clinton’s private email server illegal, it “disqualifies” her from holding any federal office.
Such as, say, President of the United States. “If you do this or that bad thing, you’ve essentially disqualified yourself as being the leader of the free world,” said Mukasey, referring to the illegal server and the illegal handling of classified materials.
Mukasey specifically points to one federal law, Title 18. Section 2071.
For those of us who do not have United States Code committed to memory, here’s what it says: “(a) Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both. (b) Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States. As used in this subsection, the term “office” does not include the office held by any person as a retired officer of the Armed Forces of the United States.”
Yes, it explicitly states “shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States.”
Shouldn’t voters know that? The media won’t tell them. So it’s up to us. Will you hold Hillary accountable? If you won’t, your the problem. Think about it.
In law…..Gross Negligence holds the same weight as Intent!
Clinton: A Career Criminal
https://youtu.be/kypl1MYuKDY
Clinton Cash
https://youtu.be/7LYRUOd_QoM
Clinton the Hawk
http://foreignpolicy.com/2016/07/27/hillary-the-hawk-a-history-clinton-2016-military-intervention-libya-iraq-syria/?utm_content=buffer57aea&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=buffer
And Just maybe….
https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/2823282/Smith-Complaint-as-Filed.txt
Most Americans live in their myths, and these myths are immune to facts. While others become angry when confronted with information inconsistent with their preconceptions equals maintenance of the status quo.
Now you may choose to look the other way….but you can never say again that you didn’t know…..Because you are personally accountable for the criminal elements you support.
I’m surprised that the ninth amendment isn’t more understood and utilized. It prevents the Supreme court or any one else from interpreting the Constitution. It seems so very inane, but, look up each word, even if you think you know the meaning. It will open eyes!
HELLO, IS THIS NOT ILLEGAL? Why are they not in jail???
you know it is all rigged because obama want’s her in their to carry out what he started and that is to ruin America
Tell us something we can’t already figured out!!