The Trump administration seems to be wasting no time getting its financials in order. Just a few weeks into Donald Trump’s term, Trump tweeted that the debt had been lowered by $60 billion. Reports are also circulating that Trump’s first budget will oversee the largest reduction of the federal workforce since WWII.
So we know how Trump plans to save money. But how will he make it?
He certainly doesn’t seem to be willing to raise taxes very much. While he has suggested that he might be okay with a small tax increase on the rich, most of the government’s extra income seems contingent on a growing economy, not higher tax rates.
But that’s not their only plan.
The Trump Administration also seems to be eyeing unpaid debts held by foreign governments — some going back half a century.
Read about how the U.S. is demanding repayment for Cambodian bombings on the next page:
He’s an idiot pumpkjnhead
Yes, people with profile pics from 2014 deserve an opinion…urp!
http://thedailyjim.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/pay-up-sucker.jpg
Trolling station‼️
If they don’t pay up, bomb them again.
Successful? 6 bankruptcies, 3500 lawsuits and his business is worth virtually the same amount he inherited. Real estate is the easiest business to make money in and he sucks at it. The only successful thing he has done is too steal from his investors and everyone who has ever done business with him.
Successful? 6 bankruptcies, 3500 lawsuits and his business is worth virtually the same amount he inherited. Real estate is the easiest business to make money in and he sucks at it. The only successful thing he has done is too steal from his investors and everyone who has ever done business with him.
Trump doesn’t pay his debts.
Trump doesn’t pay his debts.
My understanding is that this is a bill for our military action during the Viet Nam war in which the US bombed and napalmed the areas of Cambodia adjacent to Viet Nam in order to deforest border areas to prevent the North Vietnamese soldiers from crossing the border into Cambodia. The bombings killed many innocent civilians (and North Vietnamese combatants) and destroyed villages and crops. If this is the matter involved, and I believe that it is, it was the US that benefitted from the action, not Cambodia, and the assessment/debt was not justified.