Hillary’s Top Aide Worked at Radical Muslim Journal for Twelve Years

Hillary Clinton’s co-vice chairman for her campaign and closest ally, Huma Abedin has ties to radical Islam and worked for over a decade for the radical Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs.  Huma is now co-vice chairing the Hillary campaign.

Hillary is in bed with supporters of radical Muslim ideology.  Huma, her top campaign aide and “the woman who might be the future White House chief of staff to the first female US president, for a decade edited a radical Muslim publication that opposed women’s rights and blamed the US for 9/11” very well could be a Saudi spy.

At the time, (1995), Abedin was assistant editor of the Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs working under her mother, who remains editor-in-chief. She was also working in the White House as an intern for then-first lady Clinton.

Headlined “Women’s Rights Are Islamic Rights,” a 1996 article argues that single moms, working moms and gay couples with children should not be recognized as families. It also states that more revealing dress ushered in by women’s liberation “directly translates into unwanted results of sexual promiscuity and irresponsibility and indirectly promote violence against women.” In other words, sexually liberated women are just asking to be raped.

“A conjugal family established through a marriage contract between a man and a woman, and extended through procreation is the only definition of family a Muslim can accept,” the author, a Saudi official with the Muslim World League, asserted, while warning of “the dangers of alternative lifestyles.” (Abedin’s journal was founded and funded by the former head of the Muslim World League.)

For twenty years, Huma and Hillary have been confidants.  “She is the person closest to the most powerful woman in American politics and perhaps the next President. Huma has been described variously as Hillary’s “body woman,” a sort of glorified go-to personal maid, gentle confidant, and by others as an Islamic spy. She may be all of these things, because as we shall see, Huma Abedin has an interesting and complex career history.

Huma Abedin has been her sidekick for years, privy to all of Hillary’s secrets, but entwined with Muslim World League, Abdullah Omar Naseef, of Saudi Arabia.

Stone also discusses the “clear, deep, inarguable, indisputable connections between Huma Abedin and a Saudi Arabian official named Abdullah Omar Naseef … one of the founders of the Muslim World League (MWL). …. The MWL is directly tied to the Rabita Trust, a “Specially Designated Global Terrorist Entity”.

The New York Post article substantiates what Stone has been saying for some time now.  Huma’s mother, Saleha Mahmood Abedin, whom she worked with at the Journal holds very radical Muslim beliefs.  Her mother wrote, ‘Among all systems of belief, Islam goes the farthest in restoring equality across gender.’

In a separate January 1996 article, Abedin’s mother — who was the Muslim World League’s delegate to the UN conference — wrote that Clinton and other speakers were advancing a “very aggressive and radically feminist” agenda that was un-Islamic and wrong because it focused on empowering women.

“‘Empowerment’ of women does more harm than benefit the cause of women or their relations with men,” Saleha Mahmood Abedin maintained, while forcefully arguing in favor of Islamic laws that have been roundly criticized for oppressing women.

“By placing women in the ‘care and protection’ of men and by making women responsible for those under her charge,” she argued, “Islamic values generate a sense of compassion in human and family relations.”

“Among all systems of belief, Islam goes the farthest in restoring equality across gender,” she claimed. “Acknowledging the very central role women play in procreation, child-raising and homemaking, Islam places the economic responsibility of supporting the family primarily on the male members.”

She seemed to rationalize domestic abuse as a result of “the stress and frustrations that men encounter in their daily lives.” While denouncing such violence, she didn’t think it did much good to punish men for it.

Huma does not denounce any of these radical statements. How is it that Hillary can claim to support women’s rights and be a friend to the gay community, when her best friend hails from a family that holds the antithesis of these beliefs and has written for a journal that praises the abuse and enslavement of women and the killing of gays?

But that’s hard to believe. Her closest adviser served as an editor for that same Saudi propaganda organ for a dozen years. The same one that in 1999 published a book, edited by her mother, that justifies the barbaric practice of female genital mutilation under Islamic law, while claiming “man-made laws have in fact enslaved women.”

The hard-line doctrine of Sharia is what Huma was raised with as a child.  This indoctrination does not simply vanish.  Her access to Hillary for over 20 years and the money trail from Saudi Arabia to the Clinton Foundation raises even more compelling questions into whether Hillary is fit to be president.

Certainly, the connection between the Clinton’s and the Saudi’s, a nation with horrific human rights violations, is something that must be brought to the attention of her ignorant, fawning public.  Whether they are intelligent enough to following the damning trail of evidence is another thing altogether.

Source: New York Post