During the December 19 Democratic Debate, Clinton said that encouraging more Americans to carry guns will not make the country safer. Okay, then what will? Allowing those who get them through dishonest methods to shoot unarmed citizens? There’s some logic missing from that statement.
The question came in response to the earlier questioning about the San Bernardino attacks. The exact wording was “Are Americans wrong to want more guns after the San Bernardino attack?”
Hillary responded by blabbering her opinion and saying that 33,000 people a year die from gun violence, and that arming people isn’t the right response to terrorism.
Read what Clinton is adding on the next page.
Looks 80.
It’s safer if only criminals are armed
Amanda Logan cry me a bloody river. Pipelines don’t run exclusively on Indian land. Eminent domain effects everyone along the pipeline route and energy independence is important for reasons of nation security. If they gave up electricity and motor vehicles and didn’t get any benefit from a strong energy grid they might have some small grounds for argument. Right now, they need to shut the hell up.
CHILDREN
So take away the guns from your bodyguards.
IN THEIR LAST ATTEMPT TO SAVE THEIR TODAY TOMORROW
She and Obama want to move to disarm the entire country- so no matter what government DOES–and we have to comply- kinda like $#%&!@*s” ideas about disarming, therefore controlling the citizenry. Get over it, Hillary. We have the Constitution, And the 2nd Amendment – just for that reason: So that ” The People never lose their rights or their freedoms or their lives to tyranny and crime.
Neither does hillary
Not our point. We are keeping our families safe from the marauding Muslims you have opened the flood gates for.
Most definitely does, why do you think Yamamoto refused to attack mainland USA after attacking Pearl Harbor he told his Emperor there was a gun behind every blade of grass in the US.