In the annals of crime, few have committed them in a serial way without eventually stopping their spree or being caught. Yet, in the annals of criminal behavior on the parts of governments and their ability to justify through a compliant legal system the stealing of children from the home, the activity continues to this very day and has increased in its frequency.
Law professors should be the very last people who are able to write our statutes and laws, yet they are the premiere source of philosophical and cultural basis of our child protection mandates.
In yet another paper by Professor Elizabeth Bartholet, the first person she thanked was Dr. James Dwyer.
She wrote a 72-page piece, “Differential Response: A Dangerous Experiment in Child Welfare,” which was published in Florida State University Law Review.
An underlying theme is that, because some parents abuse their children, all parents need to be scrutinized.
She believes that the CPS “system is currently guilty of under-intervention, rather than overintervention.”
More state intervention into families is what she sees as needed in order to protect children.
It is clear that she is not a fan of family preservation or parental rights, and that she believes that more child removals, not less, are needed.
In all of this, both Bartholet and Dwyer seem to ignore the well-documented statistics that children who are removed from their families and placed into foster care are at least 6 times more likely to be abused, molested, raped, or killed in foster care than if they were left with their biological families, even in a less-than-desirable home.
They also ignore the fact that children in foster care suffer Post Traumatic Stress Disorder at rates higher than combat veterans.
They are 7 times more likely to develop an eating disorder.
They are prone to more depression, and have higher rates of dropping out of school, teenage pregnancy, homelessness, and incarceration when they age out of the system.
Yet they spout their rhetoric to students, social workers, policy makers, and legislators behind parents’ backs.
Turn to the next page to read about how even churches and religious organizations have had to toe the line with these radical laws and their inhibiting influence in spirituality!
Lenin, Mao and Hitler had exactly the same beliefs. That fact this woman gets anywhere near our children is a travesty. This woman should be barred from education because she knows nothing about. I served 30 years in our military and defended this country against the domestic enemies of our freedoms. This is the face of that enemy.
And you want us to trust you with their education? God forbid ! What a soviet style doctrine from someone who obviously is not a parent!#TheLeftIsLost
She should never get near our children!