Before feminism was saddled with the poor reputation it holds today, the movement was led by people like Gloria Steinem. She may not have been totally agreeable, but she at least focused on relevant feminist issues like abortion. But despite being a product of the less radical, 1960s era feminist movement, Steinem has recently fallen victim to the same toxic liberalism that has befallen much of the current feminist movement’s leaders.
Back in Steinem’s heyday, feminism was less objectionable than it is today. Nowadays, feminism has become synonymous with the liberal social justice movement. All feminists must now be liberal and must subscribe to every facet of liberal ideology. If not, they’re not welcomed by the feminist community. If they’re outright conservative, they don’t even stand a chance.
Steinem is apparently keeping up with the times. Now, she’s connecting her favorite topic of abortion with the current hot topic of climate change.
See how she managed to conflate the two issues on the next page:
She should have been aborted
If you don’t want kids get fixed ,easy as A B C .
Instead of killing babies, let’s start thinking out democrats instead. They had a life and made everybody else’s hell on earth. This woman needs a padded room or a bullet.
What a loon. Cut it, chop it off, sterlize it, take pill, shots, or just dont fk and you wont get pregant. Dont kill it because you were irresponsable in taking care of things before, Not the babies fault your and idiot. Stupid Twit
“DUH”
It’s a real shame you weren’t aborted,$#%&!@*
Here we go again a liberal crazie proposing death of babies to save our climate. Maybe too many drugs in her youth ?
Let’s start with her old$#%&!@* Since she wants to save the climate let’s start with her blood. So kill unborn children is going to save the climate what an evil thing she is. I say let’s start with her and anyone else who thinks killing unborn children is right.
YOU GLORIA ARE TAKING UP TOO MUCH AIR. CAST YOURSELF AWAY BOZINA
Dark soul….evil heart