Senator Tammy Baldwin (D-Wisconsin) discussed the new ruling granting same-sex marriage in the U.S. on MSNBC’s “Up w/ Steve Kornacki.” She explained that, in her opinion, business owners should not be able to refuse to serve homosexuals on grounds of religious beliefs. Baldwin had a confusing logic to support her notion, though. After all, shouldn’t a business owner’s right to freedom of religion, enshrined in the First Amendment to the Constitution protect him from being forced to act counter to his faith?
Senator Baldwin had to do some crazy progressive gymnastics to bend her logic to fit, but she came up with an answer:
Bull
no little weasel,the second amendment is meant to protect us from people i gov like you
Idiot
Is there such a thing as a democrat with an IQ higher than their shoe size?? ABSOLUTELY NOT.
Stop these progressive liberals in their tracks.
Trying to use your religion to deny someone their civil rights granted under that same cons$#%&!@*ution, violates two separate amendments. Obviously it violates the 14th amendment by denying someone their civil rights … However it also violates the 1st amendment by trying to use your religion as a reason to try and skirt the law set in place. Since no law may be set in place establishing any religion as one, using your religion to violate someone’s civil rights isn’t protected in your right to religious freedom. That is because no one is denying you the ability to practice your religion .. even though I don’t know what version of Christianity violates Jesus’ basic tenet “love thy neighbor as you love yourself” and “judge not lest ye be judged” …
Ok by that $#%&!@*ogy I should be able to go into a Muslim bakery and order porky the pig cake.
WHAT “book” did this dolt swear on when she pledged or affirmed to UPHOLD THE CONS$#%&!@*UTION of THE UNITED STATES?
The cons$#%&!@*ution was meant for cruds like you to stay out of our lives …
so many idiots in office