In the bitter congressional battle over Marco Rubio’s Gang of Eight immigration bill, Ted Cruz offered up an amendment that left open the pathway to legal status for illegal immigrants currently in the country.
Ted has since suggested that that amendment was a “poison pill,” or an amendment meant to kill the bill altogether. His opponents, on the other hand, have pointed to that amendment as proof that the man who is campaigning partially on his incredibly strong stance against illegal immigration secretly supports amnesty.
Ted is now trying to set the record straight once and for all, by positioning himself far to the right of both Rubio and Trump on immigration.
See what he said he would do to the illegal immigrants currently in the United States on the next page:
Let’s just agreed to disagree on Cruz, I don’t think he’s eligible to run. 5 states have him in Birthed Lawsuits and the only person who has said he was legal to be a nominee is himself.
Hell no…more BS from Cruz. Rubio is much worse!
Cruz is a liar and cheater. He has proven that already
Your so full of$#%&!@* That’s not what he was saying, at first.
Cruz has been paid by Saudi Arabia like the rest of the establishement! Don’t believe me, ask him what he will do with Islam, he knows as a Christian that they do not worship the same God as Jews and the, there God was Narum-sin, fourt king of Samaria! It is a world conquer religion! It was only allowed in America since the 1980, before then they were not allowed! Ask him if he will make sure its banned, if he doesn’t he has been paid, and if he says radical Islam and not Islam then you know he was paid! You want another EU? I don’t unless these candidates say ban all islam they have been paid and they will day they will get rid of radical Islam’s! They are all radical! Think you think he’s brighter no the establishement doesn’t want their other pay check gone! They could care less about the safety of America! They have had so many opportunities to ban Islam but they allowed Obama to bring in more Islam I! Now look they are offended about everything because it control first, sharia law then murder! Educate yourselves, don’t let America fall into this trap like every other country who fail for Islam is a peaceful religion! Please! Ideology is rule the world!
Here’s some truth. May be hard to swallow without the kook aid.
When you ask me a question about Ted Cruz, You came to the right place 😉
Michael Berry
Today at 1:52am
I am a big Cruzer! Please, Ted and crew, please help me correct misinformation blow by blow. There’s so many rumors and falsehoods out there – like this one: Ted Cruz was solicitor general of Texas at the time. Instead of just letting Haley go for time served, Cruz took the case to the Supreme Court to keep Haley in prison for the full 16 years.” http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/12/opinion/the-brutalism-of-ted-cruz.html?_r=1… I can’t find good answers for these. PLEASE help me! I’m with Ted all the way! I’m doing my part among 10,000 people I’m debating with. But we need solid answers to debunk not just try to ignore and hope the rumors stop. Thank you!
Vote Ted Cruz for President 2016: On remand, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals decided the case on the correct basis, giving Haley relief. See 376 F.3d 316. Ted Cruz was still Solicitor General and did not take the case back to the Supreme Court. That is because he took the case to the Supreme Court the first time to resolve an important question of law and not to get Haley. Brooks leaves that out. This inconvenient truth gets in the way of his thesis.
And don’t shed any tears for Haley. He was, in fact, a habitual criminal. The incorrectness in his sentence was not a matter of any fundamental injustice but merely a timing quirk of Texas’s habitual criminal law. Because he committed his second felony three days before his conviction of the first one became final, he was not eligible for the “three strikes” sentence on the third felony under Texas law, but only on the barest of technicalities. He actually got off easy in the end. Brooks doesn’t trouble you with that. It’s another inconvenient truth.
This column is a sleazy hit piece, presenting readers with a distorted picture painted with half truths.
The man was penalized due to the Three Strikes law put into action by none other than Bill Clinton.
*Note* 10,000 people can spread lies but only one actually tells the truth. When are you going to stop calling Ted Cruz dishonest and start defending his honesty. All those who accuse Ted Cruz of being dishonest should look at themselves first. Nothing is more disturbing than lies destroying an honest human being
-Greg Neal-