Ted Cruz’s citizenship continues to be a topic of discussion in the 2016 race, and it seems its one issue in which the far-left and the far-right might agree.
At the heart of the issue is the definition of “natural born citizen.” While many consider that to mean that one must be born inside of the country in order to serve in the Oval Office, others claim that one is natural born if you have citizenship at birth. The latter theory is backed up somewhat by the nominations of both John McCain and George Romney, both of which were born outside of this country’s borders.
However, since neither man made it to the White House, no Supreme Court case has ever been brought forth that specifically tackled the issue. As such, both sides continue to wage a war of opinion.
You can find the interview on the next page:
ted cruz is a Liar
The difference is Obama is black, America Was So ENGULFED IN Having THE 1ST BLACK president, Americans were pretty occupied to notice.
Well what about obumers
So why was king O allowed to be prez!?!
After what Bobo has done to the term “constitutional scholar”, I’m dubious at best, dismissive and disgusted at worst! I don’t buy it!
Being a Citizen is one thing, being a Born Citizen is another, being a Natural Born Citizen is yet another. The constitution is clear, to be president you must be a Natural Born Citizen. Some people say that the 14th amendment defind that having a parent that is a citizen make a person a natural born citizen, this was for the soul purpose of giving citizenship to the newly freed slaves, it had noting to do with the elgigibility requirements for being president. To be president, BOTH of your parents MUST have been either a born citizen ot have been naturalized to become a citizen before you were born. And by the way, I am a huge Ted Cruz fan, but the truth is the truth and I don’t want the democrats to win this election because of something like this.
What about Obama then?
http://youtu.be/esiZZ-1R7e8
http://youtu.be/xoaZ8WextxQ
http://youtu.be/5oIW5lPsfZM