In case anybody still needed proof that CNN is completely in Obama’s corner, a new editorial published on the network’s website proves it beyond a doubt.
Jumping on the anti-gun bandwagon, the 24/7 news channel got one Elliot Fineman to pen an extended call for the suspension of gun rights. Fineman’s son was killed by a gunman in 2006 and has thus made it his mission to ban guns as a whole. While it is tragic that his son was murdered, it is no more reason to usurp the Second Amendment anymore than someone calling people names is a reason to usurp the First.
But of course, this doesn’t stop Fineman from doing just that. Although he “applauds” President Obama’s unconstitutional moves to place further restrictions on firearm usage and possession, he believes that “Republican obstructionism” will prevent him (thankfully) from carrying out his tyrannical agenda.
So with that in mind, Fineman proposes something even worse than what Obama has decided to do: declare a national emergency and officially abrogate Americans’ right to bear arms.
Turn to the next page for more information about Fineman’s anti-gun editorial:
How about ridding ourselves of CNN. Try helping Chicago out…more killed every week,
and they are a strict gun controlled state…really.
CNN can go to hell…
how about we kick some cnn$#%&!@*by boycotting the hell out of them and not buying anything from their sponsors.
Go, Robert
BOYCOTT CNN. BIASED BUNCH OF SOCIALISTS, LIBERAL HACKS AND WANNA BE CELEBRITIES!!!
Communist News Network.
The Constitution forbids judges or lawmakers from infringing or passing legislation “editing” any amendment outside a constitutional convention. That amendment process is laid out in Article V of the Constitution, which says that either supermajorities in both houses of Congress or a national convention can propose them and a larger supermajority of states must sign on in order to secure ratification.
The amendment process is laid out in Article V of the Constitution, which says that either supermajorities in both houses of Congress or a national convention can propose them and a larger supermajority of states must sign on in order to secure ratification.
Problem is there nothing to restore other than the constitutional rule of law.
The problem is dereliction of duty and treason….
Treason: crime of disloyalty to one’s nation or state. A person who bet,rays the nation of their citizenship and/or reneges on an oath of loyalty and in some way willfully cooperates with an enemy, is considered to be a traitor.
The defense of the Constitution requires members of the Armed Forces to disobey illegal orders. And, in the case of alleged treasonous acts, members of the Armed Forces are constitutionally bound to arrest such offenders. (See The Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ, 64 Stat. 109, 10 U.S.C. §§ 801–946).
Now you have a choice between embracing the sometimes painful truth of reality (red pill) and the blissful ignorance of illusion (blue pill).
All it requires is for those who have taken their oaths of office to act on what they swore they would actually do.
F**k them
How about we boycott your tv. You are anti American I can do without you and ted turner.WTF.
They will know what a “national emergency” is if they try it.