We are often told that the scientific community is in unanimous agreement about climate change and that those who don’t subscribe to the theory are “anti-science”
Well, two scientists are about to get the anti-science label, as they are challenging the notion that the world is trending warmer on a consistent basis.
Recently, two Australian scientists published a paper that explains why the shifts in global temperature that we see today, are likely entirely natural.
Jennifer Marohasy, a scientist with a rather long list of impressive credentials, which includes the founding of The Climate Modeling Laboratory, opens her startling climate report with a dose of reality. “Our new technical paper … will likely be ignored,” she writes at The Spectator Australia.
She goes on to explain why, “Because after applying the latest big data technique to six 2,000 year-long proxy-temperature series we cannot confirm that recent warming is anything but natural – what might have occurred anyway, even if there was no industrial revolution.”
At the crux of their argument, is the fact that global temperatures were actually warmer during the middle ages, which used to be considered common knowledge for years, and is often denied by many climate change proponents today. These researchers confirmed that the world was indeed warmer before the industrial revolution. And that of course suggests that human activity doesn’t have nearly as much of an impact on the climate as most environmentalists claim.
If the earth was warmer before the industrial revolution, which began the release of so-called “greenhouse gasses” into our environment, the basis of the global warming debate crumbles completely.
That’s probably why this study will be ignored — because it doesn’t jive with the narrative being spun by the left.