A major decision that will impact Minnesotans’ privacy rights is waiting to be heard in the state’s court of Appeals.
It all started off simply enough. Jason and Jackie Wiebesick were a Golden Valley couple who lived in a duplex. One day, officials from the city approached them to ask permission to inspect their home. The stated reason was to collect information so as to make a decision over whether to renew the Wiebesick’s rental license.
Disturbed by the prospect of unfamiliar people walking around their home, the Wiebesick’s turned down the inspectors’ request. One might think it would have ended there, but the city saw to it that it didn’t.
Taking the case to court, Golden Valley authorities implored a county judge to issue a warrant overriding the Wiebesick’s objections and allowing them into the house. Tellingly, the judge refused their request for a warrant, prompting the city to reach even higher.
See video about the case on the next page:
BS
i would move to the american republic
Happens all the time
No can do
This is all explained in detail in Agenda 21. Minnesota is all for not only complying with Agenda 21, but strongly enforcing it. 99% of Minnesotans have no clue what it is, but the State, county and local Gestapo know exactly what it is. Try fight it on any front and you will lose big time, unless you have an unlimited amount of cash like the State does.
this is an abuse of power
Religious liberty law protects freedom of religion. How is that anti constitutional?
Nope
Ok sheep! Try reading the bill of rights SMFH some people… Regulations don’t supercede the Constitution.
I don’t think there’s a problem with that as long as it’s stated up front when it’s rented. I had a neighbor here in SC that rented 4 mobile homes. She told them up front that she did random surprise walk throughs, while they were home, to make sure that her property wasn’t being destroyed & kept clean. I questioned that, but as she explained, a nasty house could turn into a roach or rather infestation & she wasn’t having any of that. But her tenants knew this up front when they signed her rental agreement. Believe me, she enforced that surprise inspection.