A major decision that will impact Minnesotans’ privacy rights is waiting to be heard in the state’s court of Appeals.
It all started off simply enough. Jason and Jackie Wiebesick were a Golden Valley couple who lived in a duplex. One day, officials from the city approached them to ask permission to inspect their home. The stated reason was to collect information so as to make a decision over whether to renew the Wiebesick’s rental license.
Disturbed by the prospect of unfamiliar people walking around their home, the Wiebesick’s turned down the inspectors’ request. One might think it would have ended there, but the city saw to it that it didn’t.
Taking the case to court, Golden Valley authorities implored a county judge to issue a warrant overriding the Wiebesick’s objections and allowing them into the house. Tellingly, the judge refused their request for a warrant, prompting the city to reach even higher.
See video about the case on the next page:
No. Next.
Truth And Action hi all..Truth And Action. <3, I got 21 percent, and uu?..
click here ~~> #wwwhplaycomv09
…
PERVERTS IN SHOWER ,,,, never happen with OBAMA’S DAUGHTERS Tks ad: A tragedy for privacy rights!I’m tired of saying nothing & doing nothing. It’s time we rally together, get the truth out & make changes to the system.
TruthAndAction.or
He’ll no
All the City has to do is have a Fire Inspector inspect the home he does not need a warrant for a Fire Inspection.
Fight against Obama’s mandates and illegal laws.
Trust in the lord people
I THOUGHT IT WAS UP TO THE PROPERTY OWNER ..I HAD A RENTAL HOUSE EVERY COUPLE MONTHS I WOULD CALL TENANT TO WALK THRU NEVER A PROBLEM JUST PROTECTING MY INVESTMENT
Leave that city
Any law passed which violates the US Constitution is null and void, and is the duty of the people to reject that law, by arms if necessary.
Yes, like these so called “religious liberty” and bathroom laws.