A major decision that will impact Minnesotans’ privacy rights is waiting to be heard in the state’s court of Appeals.
It all started off simply enough. Jason and Jackie Wiebesick were a Golden Valley couple who lived in a duplex. One day, officials from the city approached them to ask permission to inspect their home. The stated reason was to collect information so as to make a decision over whether to renew the Wiebesick’s rental license.
Disturbed by the prospect of unfamiliar people walking around their home, the Wiebesick’s turned down the inspectors’ request. One might think it would have ended there, but the city saw to it that it didn’t.
Taking the case to court, Golden Valley authorities implored a county judge to issue a warrant overriding the Wiebesick’s objections and allowing them into the house. Tellingly, the judge refused their request for a warrant, prompting the city to reach even higher.
See video about the case on the next page:
what ya’ll fail to realize the judge refused their order for a warrent stating that the warrent was basically shady….
Those rascally teapublican brownshirts…bless their hearts!!!
If this state wins then other states will get in line also. Why, because they can.
nope
No way
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zl9i46gbIlE
do that to me expect to digest Pb!@@@
Wow. Am I the only one that caught the “rental” part of this? Sorry to tell all you people, but when you rent it means you don’t own the property. This country is built on the principle that a person can do what they want with what they own.
Government? CONTROLMENT
Go for it!! Man’s home is his castle…